Your comments
I should say I was on the batch edit screen.
11 years ago
Hey Maunette,
Is this what you are referring?
Is this what you are referring?
Aaron... I am blind as a bat... I was looking for it below the search like the other screen.
Thanks for pointing that out. Time to get my glasses checked I guess.
Thanks for pointing that out. Time to get my glasses checked I guess.
Great minds think alike!
Christine,
It just never seemed very elegant but I never had enough time to invest in finding another way of doing it.
It still may be good if a dialog of some kind was presented to the person inputting the title if they exceed a specific threshold in the title so they know to rewrite it for the mobile field.
Jason
It just never seemed very elegant but I never had enough time to invest in finding another way of doing it.
It still may be good if a dialog of some kind was presented to the person inputting the title if they exceed a specific threshold in the title so they know to rewrite it for the mobile field.
Jason
Hi Christine,
That is a part of the normal staff BLOX training we have all employees using the system attend. I will typically break a long title down similar to what you did when I encounter them.
I can lock people out of the system for mandatory retraining when they are caught doing it but that can be extreme especially on the one group that is understaffed and overworked.
Patrick, I understand where you are coming from as well. The title can lend quite a bit of weight for SEO but at the same time our second biggest group of readers is mobile. Having a title that takes up 1/4 of your screen isn't a benefit.
I know other systems that solved the issue by providing a second title field that would be used on mobile/tablet devices. Which may have resolved the SEO issue when it comes to mobile devices. However I always considered that solution flawed.
That is a part of the normal staff BLOX training we have all employees using the system attend. I will typically break a long title down similar to what you did when I encounter them.
I can lock people out of the system for mandatory retraining when they are caught doing it but that can be extreme especially on the one group that is understaffed and overworked.
Patrick, I understand where you are coming from as well. The title can lend quite a bit of weight for SEO but at the same time our second biggest group of readers is mobile. Having a title that takes up 1/4 of your screen isn't a benefit.
I know other systems that solved the issue by providing a second title field that would be used on mobile/tablet devices. Which may have resolved the SEO issue when it comes to mobile devices. However I always considered that solution flawed.
It is more a situation with mobile/net. We have people that think that because web is not constrained by page they can get creative and long with the title.
It would be for situations like this: "CRU DEFENSE NEVER RESTED: Harmon’s scheming, UMHB defenders’ tenacity held Whitewater 21 points under its average"
That was a headline that can work on our website due to real estate but when viewed on a mobile device (and personally on a tablet as well) its not very user friendly.
It would be for situations like this: "CRU DEFENSE NEVER RESTED: Harmon’s scheming, UMHB defenders’ tenacity held Whitewater 21 points under its average"
That was a headline that can work on our website due to real estate but when viewed on a mobile device (and personally on a tablet as well) its not very user friendly.
Hi Patrick,
I've submitted a ticket for a test article since we removed it from the real article. I had noticed that when I copied and pasted the seven decimal location it got truncated to five decimals which is why I originally posted this however since then I've also checked out the source for a test article with the same location and it pulls up coordinates that have 6 decimal places. (and those coodinates are different from the first and second)
I've submitted a ticket for a test article since we removed it from the real article. I had noticed that when I copied and pasted the seven decimal location it got truncated to five decimals which is why I originally posted this however since then I've also checked out the source for a test article with the same location and it pulls up coordinates that have 6 decimal places. (and those coodinates are different from the first and second)
Looks good to me!
I like the idea as we currently have some stringers that blog for us and we manually have to attach photos.
Customer support service by UserEcho
