Your comments
We are actively working on a Mediaspan integration... I will ask someone to contact you about it. =)
You could customize the core_base_library_breadcrumbs macro to give it logic that keeps it from certain URLs.
CSS would probably be much easier though... You can target CSS to a specific section by targeted the section class inside the html-container div.
CSS would probably be much easier though... You can target CSS to a specific section by targeted the section class inside the html-container div.
Hey Mike,
I would actually very much advise all sites to go through the list of profanity words. In all honestly, several years ago I just found that list of profanity online somewhere, and added it to the site as a good starting point. But, I would very much advise sites to go through the profanity words in order to make sure they meet the expectations of the newspaper.
In some cases it may go too far, blocking words that you feel are perfectly acceptable on a newspaper site. On the other hand, in some cases it may not go far enough, and you need to add things that meet your needs.
For example, there are some words that are basically medical words to describe parts of the anatomy. That may be OK with some papers in some areas of the country, but it may not be appropriate for others.
Also, it may be fully appropriate for some of the "lifestyle" words to be let through - they are not really profanity after all.
So you may want to consider editing it. (Trust me, it makes for some interesting reading.) To do so, you go to settings => profanity filters. You can create a new filter, import/export filters, and even create "white list" word patterns that can go through the filter, even though they contain bad words.
You could also create a "limited" profanity filter and apply that temporarily, and keep the other as a backup (since you can have more than one). That way you still have some of the protection of the filter, but you can be more flexible.
I would actually very much advise all sites to go through the list of profanity words. In all honestly, several years ago I just found that list of profanity online somewhere, and added it to the site as a good starting point. But, I would very much advise sites to go through the profanity words in order to make sure they meet the expectations of the newspaper.
In some cases it may go too far, blocking words that you feel are perfectly acceptable on a newspaper site. On the other hand, in some cases it may not go far enough, and you need to add things that meet your needs.
For example, there are some words that are basically medical words to describe parts of the anatomy. That may be OK with some papers in some areas of the country, but it may not be appropriate for others.
Also, it may be fully appropriate for some of the "lifestyle" words to be let through - they are not really profanity after all.
So you may want to consider editing it. (Trust me, it makes for some interesting reading.) To do so, you go to settings => profanity filters. You can create a new filter, import/export filters, and even create "white list" word patterns that can go through the filter, even though they contain bad words.
You could also create a "limited" profanity filter and apply that temporarily, and keep the other as a backup (since you can have more than one). That way you still have some of the protection of the filter, but you can be more flexible.
I think this is a good idea - I will put in a feature request.
One possible workaround - you could increase the number of abuse reports it takes to make a comment go to pending mode. Each abuse report has to be from a separate IP address. So, 3 or 4 reports may be harder fake.
One possible workaround - you could increase the number of abuse reports it takes to make a comment go to pending mode. Each abuse report has to be from a separate IP address. So, 3 or 4 reports may be harder fake.
Is one of the examples: Focus On: Owen Baughan?
If so, do you mind if tomorrow I change the times to try to re-create the issue for just a few minutes? Then I will put it back to "no publish" again. We'll need to see it in action to be able to diagnose the problem.
If so, do you mind if tomorrow I change the times to try to re-create the issue for just a few minutes? Then I will put it back to "no publish" again. We'll need to see it in action to be able to diagnose the problem.
Where was it showing live on the site? Like... on the Sports Section front page?
Can you tell us a bit more about the situation? For example, did the start date on the items change? If so, what method of posting the content are you using?
Or, are you saying that the start date had not yet been reached, but the content was still showing? If that's the case, in what context was the content showing? BLOX has internal code which specifically prevents items whose start time has not been reached from showing in blocks and searches.
How was the content corrected?
Or, are you saying that the start date had not yet been reached, but the content was still showing? If that's the case, in what context was the content showing? BLOX has internal code which specifically prevents items whose start time has not been reached from showing in blocks and searches.
How was the content corrected?
Hi Maunette!
One issue I see with this idea is that a single asset may be displayed in multiple blocks. So, we wouldn't know which block you wanted to "pin" it on.
Instead, you might consider using priority numbers - and making sure your blocks are set up to consider them. So, inside the asset, you could decide this was important so you bump it to 100. Depending on how you set up your block sort rules, it could stay there a while or "expire" when new content arrives.
One issue I see with this idea is that a single asset may be displayed in multiple blocks. So, we wouldn't know which block you wanted to "pin" it on.
Instead, you might consider using priority numbers - and making sure your blocks are set up to consider them. So, inside the asset, you could decide this was important so you bump it to 100. Depending on how you set up your block sort rules, it could stay there a while or "expire" when new content arrives.
"tag_" and "property_" are the ones I know of... Just note that those "hidden" type things may change in the future, which is why they are not currently documented.
Customer support service by UserEcho
Just a quick update... Mike, Ad Manager now saves state, so you shouldn't have to rework it each time. =)